Food security: " enforce the law for the profit " Supervision how usage control?

Food security: " enforce the law for the profit " Supervision how usage control?
Food security: " enforce the law for the profit " Supervision how usage control?
Author: The refined food security incident that Guo is gentle, it was the law and ethical and double and occupied that was refracted, so, this needs to " stress on both hands " very much ,But should do most, should supervise and bring the category into the law and punish. After the food security incident happens, must point to the food to supervise, but that the food security incident emerges in an endless stream on one side, can't try one's own responsibility to supervise on one side, supervise always after exposing in the media. We feel very strange, supervise why behave so disappointing? How why not want either to change if criticized by the public? Can be regarded as and provide an accurate answer now, reason others " enforce the law for the profit " ,Others were by punishing and living originally. The answer has come out, all questions are all easily solved. It does not have a lot of results even if scolded the model of making the morals and coming down, to get the money is more important than any other things. Supervision department, shouldn't originally become and charge the department, fine the department, but demonstrate to charge in the department truly now. , fining still has " skills " very much ---" find that can't fine to die to make the fake either " . It is too ruthless to fine, who will look for next year to go to charge the money? Actually fined fining 10,000 now of 100,000 yuan, enterprises paid " protection fee " ,How to have reason not put? Under the current system, the official working funds and personnel's salaries of some local supervision departments, rely on the charge and fine that higher authorities returned to come " Solve " ,If has not fined, have nothing to eat? Private interests and common profit can only be chosen under the situations of one, the supervision department is not " immortal " ,Put private interests first naturally. Numerous food security incidents, the food security incident of emerging in an endless stream, have already transmitted a fact - --The morals of the supervision department have come down for a long time. The supervision department can not already play real supervision function. If does not have major operation to the supervision department, I'm afraid it is not all right. In my view, first, need to abolish " enforce the law for the profit " Current situation. If the penalty can't be returned, if the welfare, salary of the staff members of supervision department, with fining and having nothing to do, then the supervision department would not be " Enforce the law for the profit " And live, would not " think every day how to create income " . This needs financial allocations, solve the supervisor's salary and welfare fully; Second, aggravate and punish. The breaching of the supervisor, frequently and its working sense of responsibility is not strong and relevant, also efforts is not strong and relevant with punishing. They will calculate for one day in one days, will come day, even if find the food question, they evade one's own responsibility thoroughly, some standards lag behind, any certificate is complete, will all become their excuse. Present supervision is to harness the river in Kowloon, and many " dragons " among them ,Not by fining and living, but they still fulfil one's own duty half-heartedly, it is not strong that this lies in punishing efforts exactly. " enforce the law for the profit " Supervision,it be must broken to last supervision function, this in most important thing at present, can't delay any more.


|