The food is supervised: The position is more important than the standard

The food is supervised: The position is more important than the standard
The food is supervised: The position is more important than the standard
According to media Wu Shuai, the brilliant red red soup hot pot one kind lets " the hot pepper is precise " Additive adjust out,low priced hot pot last " the pans chemical " . The hot pot made of these chemical additive, can sell on the market? Certainly not all right. First of all, any kind of chemical additive may bring the invisible damage to health. For example, exceed " hot pepper spirit " of quantity The mucous membrane that will damage the human body, it is apt to cause or bring out digestive organs inflammation and ulcer. The trade company is not a chemist, they are very difficult to know the appropriate dosage. In order to produce the vigorous taste of the hot pot, they may know without having the bottom line at all ultra quantity is abused. Secondly, this is a kind of commercial swindle which leads consumer's interests into a trap. As consumers, if they know such hot pot is chemical medicine is worthy of out in advance, but not genuine, they can not accept this kind of conduct of business at all. The such one " The question " In front of the hot pot, supervise the law enforcement agency but not in charge of all the time, caused it to overflow, solemn to open secret as a kind of trade. Why not manage? A main reason probably lies in, how to dispose the footing of hot pot, should allow to use chemical additive, still lack a kind of sector standard till now. According to past experience, once the so similar problem goods and conduct of business of encroaching on public interests appear on the market, the standard is not complete, or lack the standarding will often become primary cause. As the law enforcement agency, they get used to shirking responsibility with perfect assurance in view of the above too, since there are not the standard, how do we go to enforce the law? So, is not this our question very? Standard it have,it enforce the law on at all as,can infringe all sorts of conducts of business of interests public to take the attitude of ignoring and paying no attention to for eyelid, this kind of behavior is actually likewise a kind of social effects of pollution. Inert and wide looseness enforcing the law like this, in fact in the gallbladder of strong illegal trade company. Under commercial enticement of sudden huge profits, where still can it will be they and you courteous? Whether accept the morals conscience that hands can only depend on them, but this is untrustworthy thoroughly. Why did these conducts of business on the market overflow in the city? The heart just enforce the law the non-performance is probably origin on one hand badlies. In front of these markets are messy and alike, the most important thing that supervising the law enforcement agency must adhere to the position responsible for public interests, any has enough evidence to reveal that will be endangered to public interests and conducts of business of the security and should be let as soon as possible first to stop, it must be warned and chased to fine to suspected of being involved in the illegal trade company. Secondly, improve the relevant quality criteria and carry on the relevant legislation. If two order of thing go bankrupt inside out, the public may know, hurt deeply. People see one kind of such a scene easily, the functional department of the government will spend very great strength in making and improving all sorts of standards, but can turn a blind eye to all sorts of illegal activities under the eyelid, it is difficult that there is no standard to enforce the law. The crude oil of British Petroleum Co. leaks the pollution Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A. has drawn the punishing huge penalty note as soon as possible. They are not the problem that it is standard to study some. Because they understand very much, the position is more important than the standard. Without position absolutely responsible for public interests, any standard is probably untrustworthy.


|