Food safety standard can't " Coordinated "

Food safety standard can't " Coordinated "
Food safety standard can't " Coordinated "
According to participate in the intersection of dairy products and expert of standard formulation say dairy products new national standard first draft draft covering with oxing, Erie, the intersection of brightness and group,etc.. At draft sent for examination colony total number, protein content these two standards critical before national standard issue " Baffled " Overthrow, the new standard is pointed " falls back " . Expert appeal for the intersection of Ministry of Public Health and open minutes of meeting, let the public understand make standard course. Look on as the public questions " The new national standard of dairy products falls back in 25 " When, Ministry of Public Health responds: " accord with the national conditions " ,Do not " influence finished milk quality " ; When the new national standard is reduced to quick-freeze the boiled meat dumpling and is allowed to contain gold coccus, public questions and " quick-freezes the surface rice products "ing, the relevant department responds: With " integrate " ," the standard has been improved in fact " . When some food security standard formulation of public questions is kidnapped by the big enterprise, the relevant departments all deny one by one resolute and decisively, debating calls standard formulation capital and solicits the suggestion of various circles of society publicly, have fully listened to the opinion of every relevant department, employer's organization, enterprise and expert Ordinary people are not experts, the new standard is improving or reducing, can only be according to direct feeling and limited general knowledge; Ordinary people have no route to participate in standard formulation, where to know to make the standard course and shelter evil people and countenance evil practices? So, face some food security " new national standard " Reduced, though some the public and media will be scattered to send out the weak and weak query sound, but it is surging to always flood in authoritative department and authoritative expert " Respond " China. But some experts and scholars have intuitive knowledge, they can " to tell the truth " too ,Return the one incident truth, tell the public inside story. From " inside story " We are easy to find China, the new national standard of dairy products is covered with ox, Erie and brightness group,etc. and drafted, it is totally same to guess with the public. As for the formulation process, certainly it is vigorous too, however, the fact proves, busy discussion, research and expert opinion were furnished in the past, confirmed in the past " The critical standard " ,Namely later on colony total number which the public pays close attention to far and wide, protein content, " turn over one " at the last moment ,Have been distorted - -The draft sent for examination stipulates obviously colony of per gram of raw milk is not lower than 2.95 grams without exceeding 500,000, per hectogram of raw milk protein; And the scheme announced formally in March of 2010, the colony will be relaxed to 2 million, the protein reduces to 2.8 grams. It is distorted that who " The standard " ,In which link is distorted, several experts' reply is that " there is nothing to talk now " . "Have said what's the use of? " But there is the sentence that comes to the point of the nature's mystery - -The standard changes and is resulted from coordination of all ministries and commissions. Alas! The basis that some food safety standards were issued originally, unexpectedly ignored the public life and health, but should safeguard the realistic interests of trade and specific big enterprise, and can coordinate, make changes according to specific conditions. How public interests ensure, I'm afraid that can only use and resort to sophistry to gain reputation by deception with shameless juggling. To the battle of the new standard of dairy products, experts appeal for the open minutes of meeting. In fact, such an appeal is very necessary, are only disclosed, could remove the public doubt, reduce the truth, could let citizen's participation be supervised too, is it scientific and rational to perspect the new standard. If it really has flaw on procedures to make and issue, should make a new start. Only could convince people, could guarantee food's security too, ensure the citizen's health so. (favor is engraved and grown)


|