In the face of additive of question the trans-corporation is tough according to any attitudes

In the face of additive of question, the trans-corporation is tough according to any attitudes
In the face of additive of question, the trans-corporation is tough according to any attitudes
Staff reporter Li SongTao "China Youth News "( 05 edition in August 04, 2011) The question of moulding and melting pharmaceutical has not found out yet, ordinary people have to begin to strengthen the study of preservative again. In Taiwan, are found 3 kinds of preservatives in original thick liquid of coke of zero degree of global famous enterprise Coca-Cola, among them not allow to add first ester benzoic acid of hydroxyl, other two kinds of benzoic acid, own two alkene acid exceed standard. This testing result makes the public in the hinterland nervous: What such a famous big company produces is famous " The health " Why does the beverage have a question too? Everybody is expecting the supervision department deals with strictly. Should coke of zero degree dismiss from the city in the hinterland? The answer is denied. Because according to the standard of China Mainland, coke of zero degree is totally qualified. Coca-Cola, McDonald's have tough responses to this: According to the standard of China Mainland, these preservatives can be added, the content of these preservatives has not exceeded standard in the products. So, have not planned to change or delay selling. The statement from press spokesman of Ministry of Public Health has supported the uncompromising stand of the trans-corporation too. Show, the ones that found in Taiwan this time are in true food additive that is legal in the mainland in our country to first ester benzoic acid of hydroxyl, except Taiwan, are all legal in mainland, Hong Kong area and U.S.A.. As to this, Ministry of Public Health does not have necessity of the investigation. Find Ministry of Public Health of our country and make the food security national standard released, food additive and use the standard, we can see, preservative found in coke of zero degree is really legal additive. Get here, this question has seemed to already end. The national standards are all allowed to add, have anything else to can be said? However, still several questions let people feel puzzled. According to the explanation of Coca-Cola Taiwan Branch, lead to the fact the reason of the disturbance of preservative of this coke is that " the batching has been sent by mistake " ,Send the batching carelessly in inland production and sales to Taiwan by mistake. In Taiwan, all goods of coca-cola, soda, fruit juice, the intersection of tea and beverage,etc., have not all added first ester benzoic acid of hydroxyl correctly. It is likewise coke of zero degree, why can not add first ester benzoic acid of hydroxyl correctly when selling in Taiwan, selling in mainland can add this preservative? Coke of zero degree sold in Taiwan does not add and can guarantee to sell first ester benzoic acid this kind of preservative of hydroxyl equally, can not it sold normally that it is not added in the mainland that? Can understand preservatives in the meaning to the food trade, can understand too that has not perhaps damaged the health within certain consumption, but since not add and can guarantee to sell, drink too, why must add preservatives? And then come to see the formulation of additive standard. As the only department of standard formulation of food additive, I wonder whether Ministry of Public Health has made scientific and exact analysis demonstration to additive made, which are to have to add, which are too additive to add? Coca-Cola is to the statement to first ester benzoic acid of hydroxyl, this kind of preservative is allowed in U.S.A., Hong Kong area, not allowed only in Taiwan. Then, why can not the standard of the hinterland keep up with Taiwan? These questions, can not all still see the authoritative explanation. It is it low to have by this kinds of standard perhaps on thinking,can lower costs, increase these famous trans-corporations profit smoothly, also can be bold and assured after going wrong. Comparatively speaking, Coca-Cola's fairly legal reason. But another global famous enterprise despises Chinese law. July 18, Hong Kong National Health Administration release announcement, require Ge Lan plain the intersection of SmithKline and Company retract whom business sell, it calls Augmentin, specification to be pill of 375mg, reason detect, mould, take the intersection of pharmaceutical and the intersection of neighbor and the intersection of benzene and two first sour two different decayl ester, the intersection of �� and the intersection of benzene and 2 first sour 2 in their product sample ' Own ester of 2 - second base) And first sour two different Ren ester of neighbor benzene 2. This product is actually A not west forest carat links the acid potassium tablet. This has been since June, Glenn plain SmithKline Company has been demanded to retrieve its relevant products by Hong Kong National Health Administration for the second time. On June 18, this company is demanded to stop selling and recalling A in Mainland the not west forest carat links impractical potassium and dries and mixes and hangs the liquid, reason to find in the product their containing, moulding, taking the intersection of pharmaceutical and the intersection of neighbor and the intersection of benzene and two first sour 2 different decayl ester too. And according to the relevant standard of adjuvants of medicines of our country, this kind of material does not allow to appear in medicines. However, the attitude of Glenn plain SmithKline Company is tough unexpectedly. Neither disclose the detailed detail, declare constantly even his product security are OK. Supervise administration bureau ask, park and is required to recall from it national the intersection of food and medicines, it is already more than one month so far, this company does not still have and say clearly where on earth this kind of material appearing illegally comes from, also disclosed its detailed conditions recalled, do not express an silk apology to the consumers of China. The more strange one is, as to this kind of behavior which despises Chinese law, have not seen either so far relevant department makes punishment to it. According to some views of officers and scholars, some trans-corporations are after entering China, having already given up the community responsibility that ought to be born, the standard carried out to the company products, it can be low on never higher position, it is not to solve the problem to go wrong candidly, but conceal constantly, in the hope of the major issue little, minor matter. Pharmaceutical is to preservative from moulding melting, the behavior of transnational enterprises lets people down. Execution and punishing, let people unsatisfied too of relevant national standard, law.


|